SEC, SEDAR and the web with exact citations for:
Ask questions about any company's filings. Get cited answers you can verify against the source document.
Integrations and Usage:
Backed by:
Coverage
Exchanges
Last Updated: ...
How It Works
Ask
Type a question about any public company in natural language. Add filters to your desire or not, Archivist will figure it out.
Get Cited Answers
Every answer comes with citation badges linked to the exact source. Hover any badge to preview the passage, click to open the filing.
Verify
Click any citation to open the original filing. The PDF viewer highlights the exact section so you can verify every claim against the source document.
There is more to it for you to discover. Get started with your first 10 queries on us.
Behind the Architecture
We talk about what we're building in our blog. Transparency is the product.
A comprehensive overview of common AI misconceptions and the factual realities that should guide engineering decisions.
The math on autonomous agents is brutal. Chain 10 steps at 95% accuracy each and your total success rate is 60%. The hype ignores exponential decay.
If your system breaks because you changed an adjective, the problem isn't your prompt; it's your architecture. The mature approach is System Engineering.
Fine-tuning is effective for teaching form but terrible for injecting facts. The 'domain-specific fine-tuned model' pitch is mostly marketing.
Million-token context windows sound impressive. The reality: models struggle to retrieve information buried in the middle of long prompts.
The 'blackbox' narrative is convenient but wrong. AI models are sequences of math operations. Control the arithmetic, control the output.
LLMs predict the next token. That's it. They've mastered linguistic form without possessing communicative intent.
If code can do it, code should do it. There's a concerning number of AI automations that shouldn't be AI automations.
The industry conflates 'bigger' with 'better.' This ignores basic math. Running a cheaper model multiple times beats expensive single passes.
A comprehensive overview of common AI misconceptions and the factual realities that should guide engineering decisions.
The math on autonomous agents is brutal. Chain 10 steps at 95% accuracy each and your total success rate is 60%. The hype ignores exponential decay.
If your system breaks because you changed an adjective, the problem isn't your prompt; it's your architecture. The mature approach is System Engineering.
Fine-tuning is effective for teaching form but terrible for injecting facts. The 'domain-specific fine-tuned model' pitch is mostly marketing.
Million-token context windows sound impressive. The reality: models struggle to retrieve information buried in the middle of long prompts.
The 'blackbox' narrative is convenient but wrong. AI models are sequences of math operations. Control the arithmetic, control the output.
LLMs predict the next token. That's it. They've mastered linguistic form without possessing communicative intent.
If code can do it, code should do it. There's a concerning number of AI automations that shouldn't be AI automations.
The industry conflates 'bigger' with 'better.' This ignores basic math. Running a cheaper model multiple times beats expensive single passes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Find answers about our products, billing, and data coverage.